‘Computer Generated Poiesis‘ was initiated by taking a limited number of ‘theoretical’ words from – ‘Identity’ – another textual project/performance currently under construction – this project/performance ‘Machinic-Coded Identity-Theory Poiesis‘ – should be seen as being part of that same ‘Identity’ project
Words were fed/programmed into a simple java-coded random poetry generator – by clicking, one could produce between two and six lines of randomly generated text – over a thousand lines were generated and edited down to approximately just under 200 lines of text – which read like Dada… however, just occasionally, they make one pause for thought – I like that – as the concept that is initiated/signified by the randomly composed utterance, could almost be a true theoretical proposition.
Lines of text were ‘placed into’ bracelets – with ‘touch-start’ scripts – which when worn and activated would render randomly chosen lines to local text on screen (when using the the same bracelets – no two performance/renderings/events were the same)
Quan Lavender and pixel Reanimator at Angel Isles
Initially, a key factor for this part of the project was to use highly populated ‘non-arts’ venues (chosen randomly), i.e. to target the ‘average/median’ avatar/subject inhabiting ‘The Virtual World of Second Life’ as opposed to ‘Regular Arts Venue Attendees’
Via action, a subject injects itself into the system, where action is constituted within the system as a means of communication – (as long as more than one ‘subject/processing unit’ that operates with information is present, and can relate to others [and thereby to themselves]).
Communication and action cannot be separated (but can be distinguished), if Telematic Social Systems are broken down into actions, this reduction acquires the basis for connections that serve to continue the course of communications.
Utterance (an uninterrupted chain of spoken or written language) is nothing more than a selection proposal, a suggestion –
Communication emerges, only to the extent that this suggestion is picked up, that its stimulation is processed – Identity of ‘information’ must be conceived in a way that is compatible with the fact that it may mean something very different for the sender and receiver.
Within the concept of meaning, communication is always a selective occurrence.
Meaning allows no other choice than to choose.
Communication grasps something out of the actual referential horizon that itself constitutes and leaves other things aside…
Communication is the processing of selection…
Documentary illustrations are shown, however, process, communication, concept, content and event – are the work – what exists here is merely documentation
To be read in any order what-so-ever
Death
Egos grow
Significations grow
Avatars grow
Never virtualise an anxiety
Performative endurance
Perceptions rise
Synthesis endures
Never produce an anxiety
Synthesis rise
Images act
Dualities act
Courage, endurance, and desolation
Courage, death, and desire
Death, death, and faith
Death, faith, and fantasy
Desire, love, and impulse
Endurance, death, and desolation
Endurance, fantasy, and faith
Faith, desire, and fantasy
Fantasy, desire, and impulse
Impulse, impulse and endurance
Impulse, courage, and faith
Impulse, desolation, and love
Life, impulse, and death
Life, courage, and courage
Desolation, love, and impulse
Where is the mimetic transformation
Why does implementation perform anxiety
Where is the Intrapsychic perception
Why does anxiety endure
Why does perception grow
Where is the psychological technology
Why does the Id perform
Where is the psychological synthesis
Where is the performative Id
Why does Identification appear
Where is the Intrapsychic telepresence
Where is psychological meaning
Where is the Intrapsychic consciousness
Why does telepresence induce
Why does the Id endure
Why does implementation appear
Where is the Intrapsychic technology
Where is psychological perception
Where is the mimetic being
Why does signification endure
Why does the Id act
Why do the dualities endure
Where is the performative Id
Why does psychological implementation appear
Where is the individually mimetically constituted Ego
Intrapsychic meaning quietly actualises performance
Fantasy is a performative complexity – Psychic-spaces act
Significations act like Intrapsychic actualisations
Death is mimetically complex
Never objectify a Superego
Empathy objectifies Intrapsychic meanings
Mimetic Identity unknowingly objectifies projection
Intrapsychic fantasmatic identification is the complexity
The anxiety endures like a performative psychic-space
Desolation is a mimetic phenomenon
Intrapsychic anxiety unknowingly is reality
Telepresence is being
All meanings activated individually induce Intrapsychic intersubjectivities
Fantasmatics perform like a psychological synthesis
Performative psychological meanings are never Super-egotistical
Mimetic transformations fantasmatically virtualise meaning
Performative synthesis unknowingly externalises perception
Identifications externalise Intrapsychic performative telepresences
Individual synthesis leads to a mimetic consciousness
Desolation is a performative avatar
The Ego performs like an Intrapsychic technology
Never identification producing objectification
Technology is an Intrapsychic philosophy
Performative anxiety swiftly activates all intersubjectivity
All is mimetic telepresence
Avatars induce like psychological simulacra
Desire is an individual avatar
All mimetic Intrapsychic performances activate psychological projections
Performances and individual technologies activate a psychological meaning
Intrapsychic individual identifications pathologically activate a psychological Id
The Id fantasises like a psychologically performative psychic-space
Performances objectify Intrapsychic individual telepresence
Intersubjectivity is an avatar’s individual mental-activity
Performative individual technologies actualise a mimetic synthesis
Implementations act like a performative Id
Individual simulacra swiftly virtualise perception
Simulacra actualise psychological performances
All performances externalise actualisations of transformation
Superegos externalise Intra-psychic-spaces
Desire is a mimetic complexity
Individual synthesis quietly actualises Identity
Projection performs like a mimetic technology
Intrapsychic Identities induce a performative anxiety
Performativity is like a mimetic identification of superego
All dualities mimetically perform projections
Transformation is being like a mimetic perception
The psychic-space fantasmatically produces the performative consciousness
Realitys grows like performative mental-activities
Individually mimetic Egos inadvertently externalise simulacra
Mental-activity performs like a mimetic image
Mimetic synthesis inadvertently performs Intrapsychic Superego complexity
Identity is Intrapsychic complexity
Simulacra objectify fantasmatically induced mimetical intersubjectivity
Rise unknowingly like a mimetic transformation
Love is a fantasmatically Intrapsychic projection
Identities perform like Intrapsychic philosophies
Act quietly like psychological intersubjectivity
Intrapsychic technology calmly virtualises telepresence
Identity is a performative consciousness
All phenomena actualise performative Intrapsychic complexities
Performance rises like an individual psychological identification phenomenon
All performances actualise mimetic Intrapsychic dualities
Psychological identification inadvertently mimetically virtualises individual Egos
Dualities act like individual phenomena
Consciousness grows like mimetic significations
The Intrapsychic simulacrum swiftly produces identification
Telepresences fantasise like Intrapsychic complexities
All performances produce psychological performative Superegos
Psychological Intrapsychic Identities objectify individual performative synthesis
Intrapsychic performative significations quietly objectify psychological performative meaning
Mimetically performative mental-activitys actualise Intrapsychic perception
Performative intersubjectivity unknowingly actualises telepresence
Individual Intrapsychic dualities calmly virtualise performative mimetic transformation
Life is a psychological avatar
Transformations objectify individual mimetic anxieties
All identifications individually activate avatars
Avatars endure like performative Egos never externalising a phenomenon
The synthesis is like a fantasmatic psychic-space
Identifications rise like individual phenomena
The avatar is like a psychological philosophy
The Intrapsychic Id fantasmatically acts like a performative Ego
The psychological perception pathologically synthesises telepresence
All psychic-spaces produce mimetically psychological transformations
Impulse-objectification is a performative duality
Never objectify a technology
Performative Intrapsychic avatars unknowingly produce mimetically Intrapsychic beings
Love is a mimetically induced simulacrum
Act like an Intrapsychic telepresence
Life is a psychological projection
Consciousness is a performative transformation
Fantasise fantasmatically like a mimetic performative phenomenon
Significations die like Intrapsychic identifications
Identities rise like psychological projections
The mimetical phenomenon swiftly activates meaning
Mimetical perceptions quietly activate a performative Intrapsychic empathy
Endure calmly like an individual projection
Projections endure like individual transformations
Act pathologically like a psychological philosophy
Telepresence swiftly performs mimetic images
Superegos rise like psychological complexities
The psychological avatar inadvertently actualises the Ego
The Intrapsychic avatar fantasmatically produces dualities
Images fantasise like individual simulacra
The image fantasises like a mimetic Id
The psychological image inadvertently actualises telepresence
Synthesis is a mimetic psychological Id
Reality is like Intrapsychic dualities
All images virtualise mimetically performative synthesis
Psychological empathies virtualise an Intrapsychic mimetic Ego
Psychic-spaces perform like mimetic Identities
The Intrapsychic simulacra unknowingly actualises phenomenon
Desolation is a performative technology
Mimetic images individually virtualise intersubjectivity
Reality endures like a psychological synthesis
The synthesis appears like a performative technology
Projection grows like an activating performative phenomenon
Synthesis endures like psychological consciousness
Mimetically psychological philosophies pathologically objectify mimetically performative reality
Psychologically performative avatars pathologically actualise an Intrapsychic reality
Never deny externalising a mental-activity
Intrapsychic mimetic Egos quietly produce a mimetically psychological simulacrum
The avatar is like an individual synthesis
Phenomena rise like Intrapsychic complexities
Phenomena die like mimetical philosophies
Empathies fantasise like an Intrapsychic meaning
The simulacrum induces a performative perception
text ends
‘Machinic-Coded Identity-Theory Poiesis‘ was performed – in August 2013 (shown above) as part of The 17th Biennial Of Cerveira at Angel Isles – Portuguese Cultural Center in Second Life, and was organised by the Cerveira Biennial Foundation in Portugal, curated by Vitos Porta under the direction of Augusto Canedo and streamed live into the Biennial Venue in Cerveira
This work was also enacted daily – throughout the month of May 2013 at various non-arts ‘public venues and hubs’ in Second Life
such as Nelsonia
pixelreanimator 
0 Comments